Archive for January, 2008

Comfort Television

There are a few shows that the BBC makes which I have always found curiously compelling, even though, on the surface, they have very little to recommend them. These are the shows that I will watch when there’s nothing else on, or when I have to do the ironing, or when I can’t quite be bothered to get up from the sofa and do something more productive. In planning this post, I realised that it’s very difficult to say why I like them so much. But this would be a pretty crappy entry if I just wrote ‘I like these shows, I don’t know why.’ So I’m going to have a go at explaining my curious affection for some apparently boring and rubbish TV. Bear with me.

Continue reading ‘Comfort Television’

Share This
Comments

Tags: , , ,

Thursday Night Fight: Lost and Supernatural

I would like to have a word with those who did the television scheduling this year. Despite the fact that the television studios are now completely dark and we are down to approximately 38 minutes of original programming to see us through the year, they have gone and scheduled two excellent shows on the same night, the bastards.

Of course, Lost is making its highly anticipated and much hyped return. Even I, who had many harsh things to say about the show during its second and third seasons, am excited about that. Dedicated fans have actually been spotted walking around town with a stopwatch in hand, counting down each second until the unluckiest castaways ever return to the screen. I don’t think I need to hype this one at all.

Sadly, it’s going head to head with a fresh episode of one of the most underrated shows on television, Supernatural. If ever there was a time for a show to find an audience, it would be during this creative wasteland of a television season, and the poor thing is going up against Lost. You know, that other little show with a young, media-savvy demographic. Does the CW have ABC employees on the payroll? It’s the only logical explanation for this slow sabotage of its original programming.

Supernatural isn’t particularly ground-breaking or innovative; it’s basically The Hardy Boys meets the X-Files. However, it’s got one thing going for it that’s in short supply these days: it’s a hell of a lot of fun. You have two hot brothers chasing demons across the US in a 1967 Chevy Impala, blaring AC/DC and bickering incessantly. What’s not to love?

The scripts borrow liberally — and respectfully — from every B-horror film you’ve ever loved. The dialog is surprisingly sharp and funny for a CW show, and the chemistry between the faux brothers is spot-on. And while neither of the lead actors are going to win Emmys for this show, they’re a lot more effective in the roles than critics give them credit for. Call it the CW Factor. The show has also expanded beyond the predictable monster-of-the-week plots to create a fairly detailed mythology and season-long dramatic arcs, allowing the show a depth your typical horror fare might lack. Sure, I started watching because Jensen Ackles’ face was sculpted by angels and he has a voice made of gold and honey, but I kept watching because it’s a genuinely good show.

So watch Lost on Thursday. I know you’re going to. But record Supernatural. After all, you’ve got plenty of time to watch it later.

Check out the clips below for two scenes from Thursday’s episode of Supernatural and a conversation with the two leads, courtesy of the good people at Warner Bros. (Click “Channel Guide” in the top left to bring up the clip menu.)

So tell me: what will you be watching this Thursday?

Share This
25 Comments

Tags: , , ,

SAG and The Sopranos, Sitting in a Tree

Sunday night marked the broadcast of the only WGA-approved awards ceremony, the Screen Actors Guild awards. Although I did a little better than in my dismal Golden Globes performance, I’m still left with one huge, unanswered question:

What, exactly, is the big deal about The Sopranos?

They won every television drama award it’s possible to win. Now, I watched the first season of the show, so I know it’s pretty damn good, but I didn’t enjoy spending an hour each week with remorseless killers and neurotic gangsters. Got issues, Tony? Here’s a tip: stop killing people. You might feel better.

I stopped watching, even though everyone kept trying to convince me that it was the greatest hour of television ever put to film. Eventually, in order to shut them up, I watched another episode sometime in the fourth season…and it was still an hour with a bunch of thuggish hit men who enjoyed ogling naked women in a strip club. Now, there’s a time and a place for that, I’m sure, but my television set was not one of those places.

This is an acting award, and so does not necessarily signify the best show, but even the ensemble award is suspect. Is this really the best cast on television? Maybe I’m taking this a bit too seriously. After all, The Wire was not even nominated but Boston Legal was, which could be taken as proof that there is no interventionist God. At the very least, it proves that some of the voters were high when casting their ballots.

I know the show is over now, but maybe someone can explain to me just what I missed. Is The Sopranos on your list of the greatest, most awards-deserving shows of all-time, and why? And what would you have picked in the following categories?

Keep reading for the winners.

Continue reading ‘SAG and The Sopranos, Sitting in a Tree’

Share This
Comments

Tags: ,

Tidbits for January 29, 2008

  • The writers for two shows I don’t watch are getting back to work! Lionsgate has reached an interim agreement with the WGA, meaning that writers for Mad Men and Weeds can get back to producing stellar copy while smoking fat joints. (Both are on the list of shows to catch up on, I swear.) [TV Guide]
  • Just as American TV is running out of fresh programming, the BBC is kindly showing several favorites. However, none of them, not even the next season of Doctor Who, have me as excited as Ashes to Ashes, the Life On Mars spin-off starting February 7. Sure, Sam Tyler is long gone, but if that means we get more Gene Hunt, I won’t be complaining. Any other fans get giddy just watching this teaser? I mean, after you stopped giggling at Ray’s perm.

Share This
Comments

Tags: , , ,

Project Runway Gets the Blues

project runway banner

Project Runway, S04 E09: Even Designers Get the Blues

Previously on Project Runway: Ricky continued to be touched by some angel with really bad fashion sense, as he was saved while his partner Kit went home. This week: the designers are given piles of denim and asked to create their own iconic design. I’m not sure if it’s possible do instantly decide if something is iconic, but I’m not a major jeans company paying top sponsor dollars, so what do I know?

Continue reading ‘Project Runway Gets the Blues’

Share This
Comments

Tags: , ,

TV Blog Coalition: Jan. 25-27

TV Blog Coalition

Buzz shared tons of stories from the Freaks and Geeks reunion in San Francisco. (BuzzSugar)

Sandie interviewed Sophia Myles who plays Beth Turner on MOONLIGHT (Daemon’s TV)

Liz watched writers from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report stage a hilarious mock debate on the strike. (Glowy Box)

Mikey wishes that James Marsters was in every episode of Torchwood. (Mikey Likes TV)

Here at PV, Fergus looked at five shows that never made it to the airwaves, much to our disappointment. (Pop Vultures)

To kick off the Adopt A Writer project Kelley interviewed Jasmine Love, a writer with credits from Moesha, The Division, and The District. (RTVW)

Usually the first quarter is a slow time for finding new albums, but Scooter has rounded up a list of 29 albums to check out in the next four months. Well, 28 and Ashlee Simpson. (Scooter McGavin’s 9th Green)

Vance is going to miss Betty and Chuck during the strike hiatus. (Tapeworthy)

Jace was all about British TV this week, from an advance look at Torchwood’s second season opener to the awe-inspiring finale of Life on Mars. (Televisionary)

Dan had some misgivings about Carson Kressley’s tepid new show How to Look Good Naked. (TiFaux)

Raoul interviewed Rachel and TK from The Amazing Race. (TV Filter)

Share This
Comments

Tags:

Brenda Gets Her First Boring Moral Dilemma [Beverly Hills 90210]

Beverly Hills 90210

Beverly Hills 90210, S01 E08: The Gentle Art of Listening

Last week, there was more mention of Walsh parental nookie than anyone should ever have to put up with. This week, Brenda volunteers for the most unethical phone counselling line ever, nearly drives a girl to suicide through her meddling, and I discover that the Moral Dilemma of the Week-type storylines aren’t any less irritating when they involve Brenda rather than Brandon.

Continue reading ‘Brenda Gets Her First Boring Moral Dilemma [Beverly Hills 90210]’

Share This
Comments

Tags: , , , ,

What Might Have Been: 5 TV Shows That Never Made It

Ah, what might have been! With the New Year now in full swing, Fergus sneaks a peek at 5 shows we didn’t get to see in 2007.

5) Operation Runway (Bravo, Reality Show) - These girls have got the looks, the bodies and the moves to make it onto the catwalk, but have they got the tactical skills and coordination necessary to secure a vital airfield held by Taliban sympathisers in South-Western Afghanistan? (Dropped before transmission due to ‘enemy action’.)

Photobucket

TV executives feared ‘another Vietnam’ and withdrew from Helmand Province. (© Bravo TV)

4) They’re Lost (ABC, Drama) - An early draft of the hit show focussed on the families and friends of the missing, featuring many blank stares, hopeless phone calls to the airline and ‘just getting on with life, because sitting around crying isn’t going to help find them’. (Format changed when J.J. Abrams took over from Ingmar Bergman.)

Continue reading ‘What Might Have Been: 5 TV Shows That Never Made It’

Share This
Comments

Tags: , , , ,

The BBC Looks For Its One and Only

When Marcia asked me to watch and review the BBC’s latest Saturday evening entertainment offering, The One and Only, I was fairly sure I was in for another relentlessly dull, cringingly awkward cheese-fest in the Strictly Come Dancing tradition. But, I was only half right. Cheesy? Yes. Cringingly awkward? Oh my yes. But relentlessly dull? Not a bit of it! I can’t remember the last time I spent such an entertaining hour, and make what judgements you will about the standard of my social life, but I’m telling you, The One and Only is topnotch telly.

The premise is simple. The BBC has put together a group of people who all have the singular talent of being able to convincingly impersonate a famous singer. Each week they sing and the audience at home votes them off one by one. The winner gets a contract to perform in Vegas. The whole thing is presented by camper-than-a-row-of-pink-tents Graham Norton, who adds a touch of deliciously self-aware cheese that Bruce Forsyth will just never pull off.

I was making notes while I watched last Saturday’s episode, and I share with you here my insights about each of the performers:

Cher: This lady can sing, but that silver diamante skin-tight lycra catsuit is not kind to her. I can’t stop staring at her thighs. And not in a good way.

Frank Sinatra: Aw, I really like this guy. He looks like your kindly uncle. And he definitely has the Frank charisma when he sings. Also, I would actually go and see a Frank Sinatra tribute act in Vegas, because the chances of the real Frank Sinatra being able to perform there are low. Who would go and see a Britney tribute in Vegas, when the real Britney performs there?

lionel richie the one and onlyLionel Ritchie: Kudos to the makeup people. They have actually managed to make a skinny ginger-haired white boy look really quite alarmingly like Lionel Ritchie. I find myself strangely attracted to him. This is disconcerting.

Diana Ross: THIS WOMAN IS SHIT. She sounds like she’s singing under a pile of sofa cushions. I can barely hear her. The ability to wear a big wig and prance about in front of a wind machine is not going to save you, sister.

Elton John: Wearing a gold suit and giant diamante glasses, this guy makes you realise that when Elton wore this outfit, he actually looked pretty cool. Comparatively. The Elton impersonator, unfortunately, just looks like a fat man in stupid glasses. He sings pretty well though.

Kylie: On the plus side, she can wear those gold hotpants, and not many women can. But even if she could compete as Kylie’s bottom-alike, she doesn’t do very well as a look- or sound-alike. Next!

Dusty Springfiled: Aw, she was lovely. Dusty for the win!

Robbie Williams: Four words: Painted-on chest-wig. Aieeeeeeeeeee! Also, his black diamante cat-suit was a bit baggy around the crotch, which does diminish the raw sexual magnetism somewhat.

Madonna: This girl is completely flat chested. How’s she going to fill a cone bra?

tom jones the one and onlyTom Jones: Looks like a pervy man you would cross the street to avoid. Much like the original, come to think of it. He will probably go far.

Britney Spears: Looks like she’s about to throw up, sounds nothing like Britney Spears, and can’t dance. She won’t last another week.

So there you have it. This time Madonna got the boot. And I will put good money on either Britney Spears or Diana Ross going next week. But even though the format is tired, the outcome predictable, the cheese extra ripe and the one-liners scripted, I still maintain, you should totally watch The One and Only next Saturday. And vote for Dusty!

Share This
Comments

Tags: ,

Why I Watch

Have you discovered Why We Write yet? Few sites do such a good job of putting a human face to the writers behind the strike and you should definitely check it out.

RTVW answered with an explanation of why they watch, which is something I’ve been thinking about a bit recently. See, television ratings haven’t actually dropped since the strike. There are fewer and fewer original programs left to air, but people keep tuning in to whatever crap reality TV is on that night. We lose The Office, and American Gladiator becomes a huge hit. That ain’t right, people.

It can’t be that we watch just because we have nothing else to do, can it? Or out of habit? Or because, if we don’t watch television each night, we might have to talk to each other? I have been a staunch defender of television, and part of my argument is that people choose to watch because they enjoy characters and good stories, not because they are sad and pathetic drones who would rather be passively entertained than think for themselves. And I still believe that’s true, despite the fact that people chose to watch Crowned. Maybe I’m a blind optimist, but I’m okay with that.

Why do I watch? Because when television is good, it can create a whole new world. This can be the mythology-laden world of Buffy or Battlestar Galactica or the painful realism of The Wire. No one ever has to apologize for reading books, but the most common argument in favor of reading is that it opens new worlds. Well, I’m pretty sure I never would have made it to Dillon, Texas without Friday Night Lights, so I’m not apologizing for watching TV, either. I can already hear the nay-sayers, insisting that books demand imagination while television spoon-feeds its viewers. Clearly, these people have never tried to interpret one of Michael C. Hall’s expressions or visualized the Firefly universe beyond what was shown on screen. Perhaps they have difficulty viewing the television from their soapboxes.

I watch TV for the stories. I’ve already gone on at length about this subject in this blog’s very first post, so I won’t repeat myself. I’ll only add that I’m eager to wrap this post up so I can watch the third episode of The Sarah Connor Chronicles. I want to know what happens. I’m curious and intrigued and already building scenarios in my head, because that’s what a good story does. It carries you away and involves you. When captivated by a story, you draw parallels to your own life, consider things from a new perspective, find new things to care about. There is nothing passive about it.

(Edited to add that I just watched the episode, and it really wasn’t very good. Stupid Fox, trying to ruin my perfectly valid point.)

I watch TV for the characters. Yes, I know they’re fictional…except, not really. Each character came from a writer’s pen, drawn from their own knowledge and desires and fears, and then brought to life by an actor, who infuses the role with their experiences, and then watched by a viewer, who interprets it through their experiences. You get the idea. Watching complex characters interact over multiple episodes is a crash course in psychology. Television can’t be a place to hide from the real world; it’s all right there on the screen.

Maybe people are still watching because the hamtastic posturing of American Gladiator can temporarily fill that need for characters, for stories, for other worlds. But it’s just a placebo, and I can’t see the effect lasting for too long. Eventually, we’ll need the real deal. And I hope that’s not just the blind optimism talking.

What about you? Why do you watch?

Share This
Comments




Close
E-mail It