
I am starting to think that the BBC really needs to get laid. The poor channel doesn’t seem able to think of anything but sex these days. From the gratuitous sex of Torchwood (gay sex! sex in the bathroom! sex with aliens!) to the recent choreographed orgies of Fanny Hill, the Beeb seems overcome by prurient desires. Unfortunately, more often than not, these scenes seem more calculated than passionate, a deliberate attempt to modernize and claim younger, hornier viewers.
I nearly didn’t watch the recent adaptation of Sense & Sensibility for just that reason. I was already nervous about this new version, since it was directed by Andrew Davies, who recently wrote the screenplay for the dull Fanny Hill and the disastrous Bridget Jones sequel. However, my love of all things Austen overcame that prejudice, only to encounter the most ridiculous opening scene in recent television history: a slow pan of two lovers in candlelight, clothes being gently removed amidst declarations of love. Come on, BBC. Everyone knows there is no sex in Austen!
I settled in for a rather creative reinterpretation, one that perhaps featured Elinor campaigning for women’s rights while her sister pursued a singing career that required her to wear terribly short skirts. Fortunately, the opening sequence was clearly a ploy to bring in viewers (it’s good to know the Beeb has such faith in its audience), and the remainder of the series proved a rather faithful version, in many ways more true to the novel than Emma Thompson’s 1995 version.
Austen’s rich world of social restrictions and the characters who must abide by them deserves more room than a feature film can provide, and the three-part mini-series allows the program to expand on plot points the film was forced to skim. We are treated to every last letter written or lock of hair exchanged, every ridiculous tic by socially inept characters and, of course, every longing look cast by the besotted men.
And now we’re to the heart of the matter. There’s a reason Austen is so popular with modern women, and it’s not just the extremely likable protagonists. No, we read for the men. Darcy, Wentworth, Brandon…no one did swoon-worthy quite like Austen. Any man that tackles one of these roles faces the daunting challenge of capturing one of the most desirable figures ever put to paper.
Dan Stevens does a credible job as Edward Ferrars, though he’s basically Hugh Grant v.2. Same floppy hair, same fidgety mannerisms, same ability to blink at astonishing speeds. As Willoughby, Dominic Cooper captures the youth and impetuousness of that character. Suddenly, he seems less like a villain and more like a confused 20-year-old boy, a description that can easily match the character’s actions. Of course, any Austen fan knows that those two are peripheral to the real star: Colonel Brandon. Already played to perfection by Alan Rickman in the film version, how can anyone compete with that? Well, they can’t, but David Morrissey does a very good job in his own right, showing a bit more overt emotion while maintaining the stoic, loyal exterior of the Colonel. Still, could we just once have a Brandon who is actually the 35 years stated in the book? Morrissey may have held up well, but it’s been several decades since anyone asked to see his ID in a bar.
The rest of the cast is strong, with Hattie Morahan and Charity Wakefield (as Elinor and Marianne Dashwood) offering engaging interpretations of their well-known roles — and the actresses even appear age appropriate!
If you’re a loyal Austen fan, it’s certainly worth a view. The UK has already seen the first two episodes, and the second is currently available on the BBC iPlayer (UK only, alas), with the third and final episode airing on Sunday night. And, if you are the sort of Austen fan who must collect everything, up to and including the Jane Austen action figure, the series is available on DVD. After all, you can never have too many different Colonel Brandons around the house, can you?
Share This
January 10th, 2008 at 7:50 am
Boooooo. Cannot use iPlayer outside of the UK. Booooo.
January 10th, 2008 at 8:03 am
Oh, boo. Sadly, I was not able to fly to another oountry to test it out myself. I’ll edit the post to make that more clear.
I know your frustration. I can’t access the various streaming media (not that I would right now, anyway — solidarity with the writers and all), so I have to wait till everything is available on iTunes or some thoughtful person sends me a copy. Where is this global society we’ve been promised?
January 10th, 2008 at 11:59 am
I was slightly bemused by the opening but once I realised it was just hooking the viewers in, I settled down and enjoyed it very much. I think it’s an excellent adaptation and very faithfully interpreted. I’m especially appreciating the characterisation and attention to detail on the minor characters. If you don’t get those ones right first go, you don’t have a chance to make up for it later, because while essential to the plot, their appearances often fall into the realm of blink and you’ll miss it. Absolutely loving it. Can’t wait until part 3.
And I reckon Marianne is no longer a virgin…
January 10th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Yeah, the opening was totally a bait-and-switch. I mean, I had to wrack my brain to remember what part of the book they were referring to.
As for Marianne…well, she and Willoughby were in that house alone for several hours, and we know what he’s like. Just hope no one tells Brandon, right?