RSS

Adopt A Writer: Eric Estrin

Tue, Feb 5, 2008     Posted by Fergus

Miscellaneous

adopt a writerPop Vultures is proud to participate in the Adopt A Writer project, in which TV bloggers interview WGA members. We were thrilled to ‘adopt’ Eric Estrin and hear his perspective on the strike.

Eric Estrin is a long-time member of the WGA, with television credits going back over twenty years. He has written for such diverse shows as Miami Vice, Murder, She Wrote and The Outer Limits and has also served as writer/producer on V.I.P. Fergus and Marcia had a chance to ask him about the Writers’ Guild strike, and why it had to happen.


Can you tell how you came to writing, and how you got your break?
I studied journalism in college and was covering the entertainment industry freelance for a variety of newspapers and magazines. I was also the TV critic for Los Angeles magazine. After a couple of years of this, I decided to quit criticizing and start doing. Miami Vice was the hot new show at the time, and I was from Miami, had covered Miami as a journalist, and had a bunch of story ideas that went beyond the usual for that show. I teamed up with a partner, wrote a spec episode, and showed it to everyone we knew through our years of being around the business. We got an assignment for a show that never made it onto the air, but through that experience we joined the Writers Guild, found an agent and were soon invited into Miami Vice, where we wrote an episode.

How easy has it been to pick and choose your work? Has your career followed a path?
In the beginning it was easier for me to work only for shows that I targeted. I was new in the business, and everyone who breaks in gets the benefit of the doubt as the possible “next big thing.” After a while you tend to get pigeonholed in a certain genre, but I always resisted that and tried to write for a variety of different one-hour dramas. My former partner (Michael Berlin) and I also had a budding movie career going, but it was torpedoed by the writers’ strike of 1988. After that we sort of struggled to get back into TV and had more trouble controlling our career paths, as we were no longer the flavor of the month, and new writers came along with more momentum. But I’m happy to look back at my success in a variety of genres — cop shows, women-oriented drama, fantasy and supernatural, and comedy-action. It reassures me that I’m always only a spec script away from taking any new path I want.

What’s the current WGA dispute about?
Mainly new media. The industry is undergoing a sea change now in terms of content delivery. When I broke in, most TV writing was done for three broadcast networks. Then four, five and six. Meanwhile cable boomed to the point where it has partially eclipsed broadcast as a source of quality scripted programming. Now content is moving to the Internet, to computers, cell phones and PDAs. The Writers Guild wants to make sure that those who create material for these new delivery systems are compensated fairly. And that when our material is re-used in these new media, we are paid fairly for that too.

Producers willing to finance a writer’s vision and bring it to life take a financial risk, and they’re rewarded if the show becomes a hit. Writers also take a risk. We invest our time, our creativity and our very selves into making a script worthwhile. If a production company is able to reap benefits from that beyond the initial airing that we’re paid for, we deserve a small percentage of that too. What we’re asking for does not greatly impact the companies, but it makes a huge difference to the artists who create the product from nothing. This is the way book authors and playwrights are compensated too.

What’s to stop TV and film companies hiring ’scab’ writers, or writers from overseas?
Well, it’s not so easy to find scab writers who can deliver quality material in a professional way. It’s possible, but it’s a huge gamble for companies that are spending large sums of money on very tight production schedules and that are used to depending on not just one writer, but usually a team of quality writers to deliver what they need when they need it. On top of that, most writers with any talent want to be in the WGA so they can get treated fairly and receive decent benefits. They know that scabbing will greatly jeopardize that possibility. And also, most writers are by nature empathetic and sensitive to others’ situations, and they realize that scabbing hurts all writers and is wrong and unfair. The companies realize that too, and they’ll all want to be in business with us again when the strike is over.

The strike has already halted many film and TV productions. Does the WGA have the full support of other workers in the industry?
We have a lot of support. “Full support” might be overstating it, because people are hurting financially and some of them are unable to see beyond their immediate pain. But I’ve been very encouraged by the strong support we’ve gotten from within our guild, from our colleagues in the Screen Actors Guild and the Director’s Guild of America, from those who work below the line and from the general public. All of us are suffering, and almost all of us realize the necessity of the strike as long as the companies resist treating us fairly.

If production companies have to pay writers more, won’t that make them less likely to give new talent a break?
The entertainment business is extremely competitive, so it’s always going to be tough to break in. But with talent and perseverance it’s possible. And the industry is changing so fast that there are always opportunities for new writers to make an impact.

How do you think the industry will be changed by this strike?
It’s already changing in a number of ways. On the TV side, which is what I’m most familiar with, you see the broadcast networks cutting costs by relying more on reality-type shows. This makes the networks less distinguishable from cable and Internet outlets, so viewers are migrating away from broadcast. The numbers show this has been happening since before the strike, and now it’s happening faster. When the strike is settled, most of the nets will invest heavily to get those viewers back, but one or two may decide to go the cheap route and settle for a smaller, less desirable (to advertisers) audience. That will create openings for the cable networks and the Internet to step in and take that audience away. At thee same time, writers are realizing that we no longer need to work within the network system to get our ideas to the screen. Video cameras and editing programs are fairly inexpensive now, and anyone can post anything on the Internet. In the last couple of years, and especially since the strike, we’ve seen a huge jump in the quality of Internet programming. That’s going to continue, as writers disgusted with the current system learn that by becoming producers they can control and own their own material. That’s huge for writers. And technologically, things are changing so fast that it’s possible the networks won’t be viable at all in a few years. Content may be delivered to computers hooked up to big screens.

Have you spent much time on the picket line?
I live in Ventura County, about 30 miles from the nearest picket line, but I try to get out there a couple of times a week if I can. The mood on the line has been very positive throughout the strike. We can feel the support not only within the Guild but from the community as well. Most days we have actors marching with us, and it’s not unusual for below-the-line workers and even fans join our pickets. People donate food and drinks, and passing drivers honk their horns to let us know they’re behind us. It’s really different from our 1988 strike, where picketing was a lower key activity and whatever community support we had was much quieter. The result is greater attendance and greater resolve from within our ranks.

How else is this strike different from the 1988 one?
Obviously, we were much better prepared this time. The Guild brought in a longtime union organizer, David Young, to be our executive director a year before our strike vote. Young had little or no experience in the entertainment industry, and we took a lot of heat for going with “an outsider.” In the early days of the strike, the companies’ main thrust was that our leadership didn’t understand how business was done in Hollywood. This was widely reported as fact in the trades and the mainstream press. Actually, we did understand the traditional way of doing business, and we didn’t like it. So we turned it upside down, which really pissed a lot of people off. We struck sooner than we were expected to, not giving the companies a chance to stockpile scripts, and we’ve had strike teams working behind the scenes on a variety of creative strategies, including inter-guild outreach to SAG and DGA, location pickets and morale-boosting theme pickets. The other major difference from 1988 was that the companies, which control the media, controlled the coverage last time. This time, we’ve gotten our message out very well over the Internet, and we can really feel the difference in terms of national and international support. So that also helps morale, which is important when you’re involved in a long strike.

Any response to those that think the writers are just being greedy?
Obviously, they don’t understand the issues and in most cases don’t care to. There’s a percentage of writers whose work has made them wealthy and a larger percentage who struggle with varying degrees of success to get by in a very expensive city. The irony is, the extremely wealthy ones don’t need to strike at all; they’re doing it for the rest of us and for the writers who’ll come after us, just as those in previous generations fought to make conditions better for me and my peers.

So what are you currently working on?
Glad you asked, because I’m kicking off a project this week. It’s called the LAObserved ScriptProject. I’ve written the first four pages of an LA-based, political suspense thriller, and I’m asking readers to submit the next 1-5 pages each week. I’ll judge the entries and pick one submission weekly to carry the script forward. We’ll do this for six or eight months until the script is finished, with everyone whose pages are chosen getting a t-shirt and a chance to compete for a grand prize. I hope to get the first pages posted in the next few days.

As for actual, money-making, WGA-covered projects, I was getting this script project together when the strike started, so I have no assignments lined up. I have a couple of spec things, though — a TV pilot and a feature script — that I hope will lead to work when the strike is over.

And, with any luck, that strike will be over soon. Thanks to Eric for taking the time to answer our questions. Everyone should check out the LAObserved ScriptProject — it’s sure to produce some interesting writing!

Share This

 

 

7 Comments For This Post

  1. Carrie Says:

    I would happily see a change in the way tv shows are made. I’m not American but watch mainly American shows, and it is frustrating to have those shows cancelled on what seems to be a whim a lot of the time. Am I right in thinking advertisers wield a lot of power over there, and that if a show loses viewers, it’s the advertising revenue that becomes the main focus? I think that’s an awful way to make television, because then you are catering for the lowest common denominator of viewers. Which may be why reality tv does so well. I guess us viewers are our own worst enemy.

    I would much rather watch quality shows with no ad breaks, and if that means turning to the internet for them, well then that’s fine.

  2. Kyle Says:

    That’s a really interesting comment about writers becoming producers and writing directly for the internet. I feel like digital distribution of TV shows (downloads but also DVD box sets and the like) has really changed the way I watch TV — and seems to be changing the way TV is written as well. As we’ve gotten the opportunity to own our own copies of the shows, TV shows have become less ephemeral and more re-watchable, which I think allows writers to make them more complex. I wonder whether the same forms that have been flourishing on TV will do as well on the internet or if it’s going to require a whole new evolution of the medium.

  3. Paul Says:

    Eric, thanks very much for the insight into both your work and the current strike.

    I was especially interested in the ideas about how the industry might be changed by the strike. As with Kyle above, DVD in particular has changed my viewing. In fact, for largely practical reasons, I probably watch more DVDs than I do either broadcast or cable. But the programmes that I’m watching are still the ones written and produced for the networks, with the budgets, production teams and actors that come with them. I wonder to what extent the writer-controlled, low-cost, straight-to-Internet programming that Eric describes will ever be a direct alternative for either writers or viewers. It’s a hugely exciting new opportunity, and I’m sure that it will develop in parallel with existing channels, but it’s never going to be exactly the same?

    Personally, I’m hoping for a future that includes both – and with a fair deal for all involved.

  4. Jess Says:

    I think Kyle makes a very good point about DVD box-sets and like making television less ephemeral, and, possibly, making it more widely recognised as the art form it can be at its best – compare the lovingly-presented box-sets for cult programmes (for a British example, I’m thinking of the Mighty Boosh) to the fact that so many of the early Dr Who episodes were simply wiped. I do wonder how much writing goes on with an eye towards the eventual box-set (as Kyle says, allowing writers to put forward more complex and nuanced storylines, based on the assumption that each episode will be watched and rewatched) – in general, screen-writing seems to be such a constantly-evolving process and I’ll be very interested to see how it changes as a result of the strike and the issues that led up to it.

    Eric, I hope the strike is over soon and you can get back to doing what you evidently love! The WGA has my full support – it’s really enraged me to see so many British writers (well, I say ’so many’; I’ve probably only read about two articles) who are criticising the WGA for being greedy – like you say, it does show a total misunderstanding of the situation.

  5. Fergus Says:

    All good points. Practically every TV show that we’ve watched online and on DVD has already made it’s money back in some way, either on commercial, public or subscription channels.

    Many of the strengths of the internet as a broadcasting platform are actually the things that make it less attractive to big advertisers…geographically dispersed viewers, relatively small audiences and the lack of outlet control. None of this would matter if TV was getting cheaper to produce, but in fact the opposite is happening.

    In the short term at least, internet-only TV is going to the realm of the enthusiastic amateur.

  6. Steph Says:

    Eric, this was super-interesting, thanks for sharing your experiences!

    I add my voice to those saying that I support the WGA 100%!

    (As well, TV on DVD is one of the best inventions EVER, but everyone needs to get paid for it, for sure!)

  7. Zoje George Says:

    Eric, thanks for taking the time to talk with PV. It’s been heartening to see SAG supporting WGA so thoroughly this time around.

3 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. TV Blog Coalition: Feb. 8-10 | Pop Vultures Says:

    [...] We interviewed writer Eric Estrin and got his perspective on the WGA strike. (Pop Vultures) [...]

  2. TV Blog Coalition - Link Time! Feb. 8-10 | Daemon's TV Says:

    [...] Pop Vultures interviewed writer Eric Estrin and got his perspective on the WGA strike. (Pop Vultures) [...]

  3. Mikey Likes TV » Linkin’ Blogs: The TV Blog Coalition, Feb. 10 Says:

    [...] Pop Vultures interviewed writer Eric Estrin and got his perspective on the WGA strike. (Pop Vultures) [...]

Leave a Reply

Close
E-mail It