RSS

No Sign of Intelligent Life on Mars

Wed, Oct 15, 2008     Posted by Samantha

Action, New Stuff, Sci-fi and Fantasy

Usually, I feel it’s not really fair to judge an entire series on its pilot episode. Premiere or pilot episodes are often a bit clunky; the actors haven’t settled into their roles yet, the sets have a tendency to look cheap and unfinished (because they often are), and the entire thing is really just a sales pitch. “Like this? We’ll make more!” There’s a lot of room for forgiveness in a pilot episode. My normal policy is to give a series a three-episode grace period, to determine if it’s going to be something that interests me enough to allow it to cut into my reading and Internet time.

The American version of Life on Mars is getting no such grace period. It’s already wasted two hours of my time. First there was the ill-conceived, ill-written, and ill-acted LA-based pilot, and now comes its second bite at the apple — and not just any apple. The Big Apple.

The basic premise of the show, for those of you who’ve been living on, well, Mars, is based on a big city cop who gets slammed 35 years into the past. We first meet our hero, Sam Tyler (Jason O’Mara) in the middle of a high-speed race to the house of a suspected serial killer. His partner and girlfriend, Maya (Lisa Bonet), is along for the ride and a Relationship Discussion. Yeah, this is the appropriate time and place – perhaps this is supposed to illustrate how he’s more committed to the job than her. Either way, it feels lazy and rushed.

Which is exactly how one could describe the overall pacing of the show: lazy and rushed. At times the writers seem so focused on getting on with their story or shoving information at the viewer that the character development loses out, and that’s a damn shame in a show like this, where everything rests on character. Far too often, the pace and writing rely on “tell tell tell, and then tell some more.”

By the time Sam is catapulted into the past, the viewer should be close enough to him to feel his disorientation and distress at his situation, where everything old is new again, and the dawn of forensic police work isn’t yet pinking the horizon. Instead, the drama feels like it’s played for laughs and we never get a true sense of how Sam’s dealing with being thrust into something utterly impossible. Jason O’Mara is simply miscast in this role. Sam’s a cop, but a cerebral cop. O’Mara can’t seem to hit the cerebral marks and, due to his size, his carriage is exactly the same as everyone else’s. He isn’t physically separated from his new squad mates in any way.

The characters in the past are paper-thin stereotypes of what we’ve seen on most cop shows through the years, except these are pale shadows of the clichés that preceded them. At least in re-casting the role of Gene Hunt with Harvey Keitel, there’s a real New Yorker in the mix who actually lived through the time period he’s acting. I may have only been seven in 1973, but even I know that cops would not be speaking the wholly unbelieveable quasi-Cockney that comes tumbling out of Detective Ray Carling’s (Michael Imperioli) mouth like some kind of TV-safe Tourette’s. There’s no way you’d ever get me to believe a cop like Ray would say, “You’re a lunatic! You’re crazier than he is, and he’s crazier than a fruit bat at a cranberry convention.”

I’ll let you just savor that gem for a bit.

Sam’s one touchstone amidst this chaos is supposed to be the open-hearted but tough Annie Norris (Gretchen Mol), a young woman with a psychology degree who’s too much a lightweight in both mannerism and temperament to be a rookie officer in the NYC police department. Her interactions with Sam come off as too modern for the times, and too intellectually timid to inhabit these early years of feminism in which women were fighting tooth and nail for their right to be accepted as equals in the workplace. Mol’s Annie doesn’t even attempt to defend herself or hold her place when targeted by one of Ray’s many crude put-downs. How’s she supposed to help Sam hold himself together when she can’t even look most of her co-workers in the eye? She’s a long way off from Pepper.

With paper-thin characters and little emotional heft, the two, count ‘em two, shots of 1973’s Twin Towers feel gratuitous and manipulative. Unfortunately for the creators of this show, the era they’re recreating really was a watershed in New York filmmaking and the cop genre, so every false note bangs up against the contemporaneous material in our cultural memory. They’d have been better off choosing another city, one that didn’t know Popeye Doyle or Serpico or even Klute. Rent one of those or, better yet, check out the original UK version of Life on Mars. Don’t waste your time on this one.

Share This

 

 

9 Comments For This Post

  1. Rachel Says:

    I’ve been surprised by how many people actually seem to be enjoying this crap - even some people who saw and loved the original!

    I will never understand people.

  2. Samantha Says:

    It was very difficult to review this on its own merits, as the original was so tight and well-acted. I actually went back and checked how long it was before the UK Sam Tyler got put into the past because I thought for sure it was 15 or 20 minutes in, but no, they both clocked it at about minute eight. That’s what was strange about the pacing, in the same amount of time, the viewer got completely attached to the UK Sam Tyler and the US Sam Tyler was still unknown.

    I can’t even begin to tell you how much I hated that first Twin Towers shot. They didn’t earn it.

  3. zero democracy Says:

    I don’t know what a thick necked and thuggish dipshit like Sam would be doing driving around listening to an album as fey as Hunky Dory. At least with the UK version it made sense due the natural effeminacy of Englishmen.

  4. Dave Says:

    I haven’t watched this yet, though I am kind of intrigued to see what they do with it. The problem is that I was such a fan of the original, which was so well done, that I feel as though I’m never going to really give it a fair chance.

    Similar story with Ashes to Ashes, when that aired it suffered a little from comparisons with the original, but then I got hooked in again.

  5. Marcia Says:

    Zero democracy, you’re on the wrong blog if you want to diss either David Bowie or Englishmen, as I’m rather fond of both of them.

    Dave, I was never able to get into Ashes to Ashes, just because I loved the original so much that it always paled in comparison. It felt like a parody of Life on Mars, rather than a quality show in its own right.

  6. Dave Says:

    I felt like that at first, and then I really got into it and was very curious about where it was going. Plus there was a very intriguing end to the first series, which I don’t think anyone saw coming.

  7. Samantha Says:

    Dave: I tried really hard to be objective and judge it on its own merits. Believe it or not, I would have been even meaner if I’d been doing a scene by scene comparison.

    zerodemocracy: I can’t remember if Hunky Dory was near the beginning or the middle of the glam rock thing, but everyone was listening to it.

  8. Dave Says:

    Sam : I think you did a pretty good job of being objective with it, though I don’t object to being mean when it’s deserved.

    Part of the fun of the original was some of the differences in the time, and things like the test card girl talking to Sam. What are they going to use as an equivalent to that I wonder.

  9. Samantha Says:

    I must learn to sit on my articles for a good 24 hours before posting them though. I just thought of another thing I wanted to mention — but it is a bit of a comparison.

    In the US version, all of the outside scenes are filmed with a muddy sepia filter further distancing the viewer from the reality of Sam’s situation.

    The UK version outdoor scenes all had a crisp crystalline quality to them. Almost a hyper-real.

    And the other difference is that the Manchester street scenes were strangely deserted, while the NY scenes are filled with people; like they were trying too hard to fill our eyes with “Hey look! It’s the 70s, check out the natural ‘fros, can’t you just smell the patchouli?”

Leave a Reply

Close
E-mail It