Archive for the 'adaptations' Category

Examining The No. 1 Ladies’ Detective Agency

no 1 ladies detective agencyI was working in a bookshop when The No.1 Ladies’ Detective Agency by Alexander McCall Smith was first published, and I remember that there was some debate over whether we should shelve it in the crime fiction section or not. It did, after all, purport to be about a detective agency. But the jacket design (lots of bright colours and African prints) didn’t seem to fit in with the normal crime fiction jacket traditions (black cover, sinister picture involving blood and/or a disembodied eye). So, taking one for the team, I read the book and promptly reported back that it definitely didn’t belong in crime fiction. We shelved it in general fiction, and began recommending it to all women of a certain age who came in asking for ‘a nice book’. I sent a copy to my Mum - she loved it.

The book, you see, is a gentle tale about Precious Ramotswe, a young woman from Botswana who uses her inheritance to set up a detective agency, where she spends her days settling neighbourly disputes over cow ownership and never gets involved in anything more sinister than spying on the occasional philandering husband. The stories (and there are several - McCall Smith wrote a whole series) contain many ‘characters’, and crime solving takes a back seat to loving descriptions of Bostwanan social life and customs.

The late Anthony Minghella’s film version (this was, in fact, his final completed work) takes an entirely different approach. The problems of modern-day Africa are brought to the forefront. HIV, witchcraft, kidnapping, child mutilation and corruption become the focus of Precious’s investigations, although she still dabbles in philandering husbands on the side. Instead of the sunshine-and-laughter escapism of the books we get gritty social commentary and a heroine haunted by her escape from a violent husband and a miscarried baby.

no 1 ladies detective agency castMinghella doesn’t entirely dispense with the light-heartedness with which McCall Smith imbued the books. The ‘characters’ are all there - Precious’s hopeless suitor Mr Matekoni is delightful in his steady devotion, and I was particularly fond of the secretary, Grace Makutsi, who valiantly struggles with two typewriters which both have several letters missing but combined can type the full alphabet. I was also delighted to see the wonderful Idris Elba (The Wire’s Stringer Bell) playing the villain, proving that he can be sinister, threatening, and yet still achingly cool, in any accent.

Television versions of books are not obliged to be faithful to the texts on which they’re based, and it can be argued that they shouldn’t even try. TV and text aren’t the same, and naturally the story is going to emerge a little differently. Minghella’s portrayal of Botswana in The No.1 Ladies’ Detective Agency is, almost without doubt, a more realistic one than the idyllic and simple land where the sun always shines (literally and metaphorically) in McCall Smith’s books, and I’m not saying that’s a bad thing. But there’s no doubt that by emphasising the real, some of the charm of the original stories is lost, and I wonder if that was the intention.

The No. 1 Ladies’ Detective Agency is currently available to view on the BBC iPlayer, and it will no doubt be repeated endlessly on the BBC anyway - they’re going to milk the fact that they commissioned Minghella’s last film for all it’s worth. If you’re outside the UK, I’m willing to bet this will be coming to a network near you sooner rather than later. Keep an eye out - it’s worth a look.

Comments

Tags: , , ,

The BBC Shows Some Sense & Sensibility

sense and sensibility bbc

I am starting to think that the BBC really needs to get laid. The poor channel doesn’t seem able to think of anything but sex these days. From the gratuitous sex of Torchwood (gay sex! sex in the bathroom! sex with aliens!) to the recent choreographed orgies of Fanny Hill, the Beeb seems overcome by prurient desires. Unfortunately, more often than not, these scenes seem more calculated than passionate, a deliberate attempt to modernize and claim younger, hornier viewers.

I nearly didn’t watch the recent adaptation of Sense & Sensibility for just that reason. I was already nervous about this new version, since it was directed by Andrew Davies, who recently wrote the screenplay for the dull Fanny Hill and the disastrous Bridget Jones sequel. However, my love of all things Austen overcame that prejudice, only to encounter the most ridiculous opening scene in recent television history: a slow pan of two lovers in candlelight, clothes being gently removed amidst declarations of love. Come on, BBC. Everyone knows there is no sex in Austen!

I settled in for a rather creative reinterpretation, one that perhaps featured Elinor campaigning for women’s rights while her sister pursued a singing career that required her to wear terribly short skirts. Fortunately, the opening sequence was clearly a ploy to bring in viewers (it’s good to know the Beeb has such faith in its audience), and the remainder of the series proved a rather faithful version, in many ways more true to the novel than Emma Thompson’s 1995 version.

Continue reading ‘The BBC Shows Some Sense & Sensibility’

Comments

Tags: , , , , , ,

Dancing Queens: Ballet Shoes on the BBC

You can normally rely on the BBC to put on something special over Christmas. This year their offerings included a Dr. Who special featuring Kylie Minogue, a Top Gear special interview with Evel Knievel, and a brand new episode of the really quite lovely Robbie The Reindeer. And all of this on top of The Queen’s Speech and endless repeats of Dad’s Army. Lucky us. But, for me, the most eagerly anticipated of the BBC’s festive offerings was their new adaptation of Ballet Shoes, the magnificent novel by Noel Streatfeild, about three sisters who go to stage school.

balletshoes.jpgI suppose I should have expected disappointment, because television and film adaptations of your favourite novels rarely live up to the versions in your imagination. In fact, I’m struggling to think of any screen adaptation that’s as good as the original novel, except perhaps Pride and Prejudice, and that is mostly to do with my love of Colin Firth. But the BBC’s Ballet Shoes disappointed me because I’ve read the novel so many times that I just ended up being cross with them for all the details they changed.

Of course, if I’d never read the book, I’d have been able to appreciate all the things that were good about the adaptation. The BBC’s period dramas are unparalleled for their beautiful cinematography and staging, their period music and fashions and the detail in every scene. And Ballet Shoes was no exception to this - it was visually stunning, and sucked you right into 1930s London from the first moments. The casting was, for the most part, spot on. Emma Watson (best known, of course, as Hermione in the Harry Potter movies) can certainly act, even if she is way too old to be playing a character who, at the beginning of the story at least, is supposed to be about 12; Richard Griffiths was an inspired choice to play Great Uncle Matthew; and I thought that Marc Warren did an excellent job in the understated part of Mr Simpson.

emma watson ballet shoesBut, all of this good stuff was eclipsed by my distress at watching the BBC tell a story I love, and doing it all wrong. The thing Noel Streatfeild consistently got so right in her novels for children (which are almost all about child prodigies of one kind or another) was the way she always included all the minutiae of the life of a child in show business. Readers are fascinated by the details of how one goes about registering for an acting licence, of all the different outfits needed for stage school, or what theatre terminology means. It makes it all seem real, and brings the fantasy to life.

But the BBC neglected all of these delicious details in favour of creating romantic sub-plots for the adult characters. The stage careers of the three Fossil sisters were pushed into the background repeatedly in favour of the romantic angst of their old-maid guardian, the loneliness of a widower who lost his wife and child to cholera, and a washed-up dancer who longs for the excitement of her youth. I expect that this was the BBC’s attempt to create an adaptation that appealed to adults as well as children, but it honestly didn’t work. Especially because most adults watching must have known the novel better than their children did anyway; it’s been in print since 1936.

I feel that Ballet Shoes was an opportunity missed for the BBC. If only they had taken the time to think about why the novel is so loved - the details about performance, the window into the theatrical world through the eyes of a child, the vicarious thrill of imagining yourself onto the stage - instead of trying to reshape it into something else, it could have been wonderful. Instead, the adaptation is lovely to look at, but irredeemably off-key. If however, you missed it when it aired on Boxing Day and I haven’t totally put you off, you’ll be pleased to know it’s available on DVDfrom January 7th.

Comments

Tags: , ,

Not-So-Naughty Fanny

Plattie joins us again to explain how the BBC ruined sex. (Okay, that might be a bit of an overstatement.)fannyhill-cover.jpg

It’s a BBC adaptation of a famous erotic novel about prostitution (the lots-of-sex-is-good kind, not the tragedy-of-the-sex-worker kind), it has a star-studded cast (Alison Steadman, Hugo Speer, Samantha Bond) and it’s broadcast after 9pm which means lots of nudity - hurrah! Sounds like good times all round, right?

Well, I just finished watching the latest BBC costume drama to grace our screens, Andrew Davies’ adaptation of John Cleland’s 1749 novel, Fanny Hill or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure. Andrew Davies is a veteran of the period novel adaptation, he’s done plenty of them, and it is to him we owe the spectacular 1994 BBC production of Pride and Prejudice. You know the one I mean, with that dripping wet Colin Firth in tight britches scene (Oh! Mr Darcy!). So, it’s fair to say I had high hopes for Fanny Hill, since the book is celebrated as the original erotic novel. I actually wrote a Master’s thesis on eighteenth century erotica, so I could explain to you at length why Fanny Hill is not in any way the original erotic novel, but I will refrain. It is, at any rate, a very raunchy book, and it has never gone out of print once in the last 258 years, so it must have something about it.

The two-part BBC adaptation follows the basic plot of the novel: A young and destitute Fanny Hill comes to London, gets taken in by a madam, is initially horrified at the idea of selling her body but quickly comes around once she discovers that she actually rather likes it, has various adventures, and eventually settles down and marries her one true love. Sorry, by the way, if I have now spoiled the plot for you, but it’s been around for nearly 300 years, so I figure the statute of limitations on spoilers has long expired.

You would think that with scenes including Fanny’s seduction and ‘training’ at the brothel, flagellation with birch twigs, several all-out orgies and at least fifteen more ‘vanilla’ sex scenes thrown in as well, the production couldn’t fail to be at the very least titillating. But somehow, it just doesn’t work.

fanny_hill_lead.jpgIn the novel Fanny may, for a very few introductory pages, maintain an air of innocence and virginity, but she quickly casts this off and launches herself head-first into a life of iniquity. The joy of the book is in its gleeful dismissal of morality and chastity. The novel’s Fanny goes from one conquest to the next, delighting in their ‘enormous machines’ and ‘furious engines’. But Rebecca Night’s Fanny is an irritating mixture of coy and smug, always remaining aloof from the world she occupies. I appreciate that broadcasting standards prevent the BBC from actually showing any ‘enormous machines’, but with a more overtly sexual actress in the lead role it wouldn’t have mattered.

The beauty of the book is in its downright muckiness. The television version is all authentic costumes, stunning photography and award-worthy set design, but in the end, it’s just too prim and proper. It would seem that Andrew Davies, and the BBC Costume Drama Department, are better at more understated sexuality. I will take Mr Darcy telling Elizabeth Bennet how ardently he admires and loves her over a dozen awkward but beautifully-lit orgies any day.

If you are at all tempted to watch the BBC adaptation of Fanny Hill, I have no doubt they will be repeating it ad nauseum over the festive season. But really, if you’re looking for a bawdy eighteenth century romp, you’ll be a lot better off with the book.

Comments

Tags: , , ,



Close
E-mail It