Archive for the 'debates' Category

“Way Down in the Hole” With The Wire

The fifth season of The Wire has received a tremendous amount of press, most of it slavering over the pure genius of the show (I include myself in that). There has also been a fair amount of debate regarding the direction of this season. Is David Simon giving too much airtime to the newsroom at the expense of characters we’ve come to love? Has McNulty’s recent insanity strained the believability of his character? On a scale of 1 to 10, exactly how much do you want to see that punk-ass Marlo get what’s coming to him? (The only correct answer to that last one is 11.) However, there has been remarkably little discussion of this season’s version of the show’s theme song.

Tom Waits may have recorded “Way Down in the Hole” back in 1987, but twenty years later most people only know it as the theme to The Wire, if they know it at all. And that’s a damn shame, because this is one hell of an awesome song. Each season of the show features a new version of the tune, and they all interpret it differently. The Blind Boys of Alabama brought out its lowdown, bluesy notes, perfect for the first season’s focus on Baltimore’s inner-city drug trade. In season 2, Waits himself, the poet laureate of America’s working class, set the tone for the stories of the dock workers. Each season has used the theme to set the stage for its story arc, and I’m curious to see how Steve Earle’s version will match the show’s final season.

Have a listen to the clips below, then tell me: does this season’s rendition live up to those that have come before? And which is your favorite take on the song?

Continue reading ‘“Way Down in the Hole” With The Wire’

Comments

Tags: ,

Kooks, Nutjobs and General Incompetents

I have tried to make this entry funny. Really, I have. It turns out that there is a very fragile anger/snark balance, and right now I’m too annoyed to properly access the snark. You see, yesterday I gave the first two episodes of Samantha Who? a try. The show has received fairly warm reviews and it looks a safe bet to be picked up for an entire season. Granted, considering its competition this season, that’s not saying much. It turns out that, for the most part, the show is a moderately successful, light-hearted comedy. So why did it have me yelling and chucking things at the TV?

Continue reading ‘Kooks, Nutjobs and General Incompetents’

Comments

Tags: , ,

Same old, same old. Is ‘groundbreaking’ television a myth?

We’re about a month into this year’s crop of new shows and the victors are starting to emerge. Interestingly, the only clear winner so far is Pushing Daisies, a show that is being heralded for its originality in the midst of the startling mediocrity of the other programs. Fans and critics both agree: it’s clever! Beautiful! Interesting! Groundbreaking! I was with them right up until the last one. Groundbreaking? Is any word more overused in television or film? The word suggests a beginning, a clearing away of old rubble in order to build a new foundation upon which glorious structures can be built. Does this mean that we can expect to see a slew of original, visually-stunning fairy tales in coming years? Certainly, there will be a few half-hearted attempts at imitation, but I don’t see my schedule suddenly filling with shows steeped in magical realism. Pushing Daisies is innovative and has the potential to be influential, but that’s a world apart from groundbreaking.

Let’s go back a few years, to 1998. Will & Grace had just premiered to raves. It was a success, both in terms of critical response and ratings, and was widely hailed as a groundbreaking sitcom for featuring two gay characters. The mainstream show earned a huge audience, clearing the way for more gay leads in the future. Nine years later, there’s been…no, wait…I’m sure I’ll think of one…er, nope. That was it. (The aspiring drag queens of America’s Next Top Model don’Ugly Bettyt count.) Influential, yes, as seen in the slightly increased visibility of gay supporting characters, but I don’t see any towering rainbow structures being built on its groundbreaking premise.

Last year, Ugly Betty was heralded as the breakthrough, “groundbreaking” show due to its plain-Jane lead whose dowdy fashion sense, unibrow and braces made her nearly immune to objectification. We were supposed to root for the “ugly” woman. She was given a cute love interest. Clearly, representations of women on television had changed at last! From now on, we’d see more realistic portrayals of feminine beauty, right?

Ahem. Let’s take a look at the success rate in a sampling of this fall’s more prominent shows.

Continue reading ‘Same old, same old. Is ‘groundbreaking’ television a myth?’

Comments

Tags: , , , , , , , ,



Close
E-mail It