Archive for the 'dramas' Category

Swinging Through the Summer

Swingtown cast

I was born in the 70s. I drank Tab, and bought records, and wore frighteningly huge jeans. My family would go to potluck block parties, kids rode their bikes throughout the neighborhood, and we all thought that Jello salad satisfied the “fruit” requirement of a square meal. In that way, I recognize the world in Swingtown, a world that looks just how I remember it. That is, until everyone starts taking off their clothes. I don’t remember that 70s at all (which is probably for the best, considering that I was six when the decade drew to a close). However, after viewing the first episode, it is a world I plan to visit again.

Swingtown is CBS’s entry into the original summer programming schedule. It’s an interesting show, a strange cross between the groovy goodness of Boogie Nights and the emotional brittleness of The Ice Storm — with a liberal helping of Wonder Years nostalgia topping it all off. Perhaps the strangest thing about the show is that it’s on CBS, a network that has no aversion to dismembered body parts (see its CSI catalog), but has remained nearly virginal in regards to sexual matter. Suddenly, it’s airing a primetime show that happily features orgies, partner-swapping and implied teenage sex, in addition to such 70s treats as quaaludes and coke. The Parents Television Council is already in a tizzy, I assure you.

The promise of naked, writhing bodies and the controversy surrounding the show drew a fair number of viewers for last week’s premiere, despite the show receiving only fair to middling reviews — proof that you can never underestimate the prurient interest of the American people. And this is a good thing, because the show is better than the initial reviews would suggest, and it has potential to be a damn good show.

It’s easy enough to comment on the strangely unerotic orgy scene (hey, it’s hard to make muttonchops look sexy in 2008), or the coked-out neighbor, and to think that the show is geared toward the lowest common denominator. However, much like Big Love, it seems to have less interest in exploring the details of this, well, unconventional lifestyle choice and more in using it as a springboard to explore universal human emotions of love, jealousy, longing and, yes, lust.

I may remember the 70s as a time of roller skates and disco, but sociologists tell tales of a darker world, one of people trying to find their way when stuck between the traditional family values of previous decades and the more permissive values that emerged from 60s counterculture. Swingtown takes a fairly literal view of this conflict, plopping traditional families and marriages into the heart of a sex-crazed, anything-goes neighborhood. Here, the fact that it’s on CBS may actually work in its favor. The show cannot hope to titillate through excessive amounts of bare flesh or gratuitous sex scenes. Instead of finding drama in the bedrooms, it mines everyone’s reactions to the sexual liberation, and the fallout that’s sure to ensue.

The show offers strong acting across the board. Jack Davenport and Molly Parker convincingly and subtly portray the complex emotions that would inspire them to open their marriage, a feat more remarkable for the script’s lack of subtlety. Grant Show and Lana Parrilla have a bit less to work with, as the confident pros of partner swapping, but they convincingly swagger around the pilot and are entirely believable in their seduction of the neighborhood noobs. The only weak spot is Mirriam Schor, though that fault may lie less with the actor than the script. Her shrill Puritan is the show’s biggest misstep, as her character’s strident moral judgments only make the sex-and-drugs lifestyle far more appealing. Simplistic characters have no place on a show that seeks to deal with complicated moral issues, and this women is in dire need of some character development.

Currently, Swingtown only has a 13-episode summer run, and if it continues to sit on the fence as to whether it’s a good-time guilty pleasure or a thoughtful exploration of the sexual mores and contradictions of the time, 13 episodes will be plenty. If, however, it manages to pick a side or — better yet — seamlessly blend the two, we may find ourselves wanting to visit Swingtown long after the summer heat has subsided.

If nothing else, at least it will teach a new generation how to do the Hustle. Some things are timeless, after all.

Swingtown airs on CBS, Thursdays at 10:00pm

Comments

Tags: , , , ,

Finale Thoughts: Bones and House

Finale season is over. The networks have all fired their big guns, looking for ways to hook their audience into returning in the fall. Since seasons that neatly wrap things up in a pretty plot package topped with a bow of satisfying character resolution don’t really get people talking around the water cooler, most shows prefer to take the time-honored ’shock the audience’ route. After all, if we’re talking about it, it’s gotta be good, right? And, if a show misses the mark, they’ve got the whole summer to figure out a way to fix it — and the viewer has the same time to stop feeling quite so cheated by a disappointing finale. Of course, if you’re the viewer who’s been subjected to a truly ludicrous plot twist in the name of surprise, you are probably feeling a bit less certain of this strategy.

Both House and Bones went out with a big old bang, and definitely got people talking. Unfortunately, in one case it was more bitching and whining than talking, and a prime example of a show that relied on short-term shock to the show’s long-term detriment. The other case was a heart-wrenching ending that thoughtfully shifted the show’s dynamic. To find out which is which, follow the jump to the spoilers.

Continue reading ‘Finale Thoughts: Bones and House’

Comments

Tags: ,

Tipple Tuesday: Lost

Do the many unanswered questions and convoluted plots on Lost drive you to drink? Pop Vultures has your back, with an easy game you can play along with at home. However, we do not take any responsibility if you have to phone in sick the next day — this game is not for the faint of liver.

The rules of the Lost drinking game are far simpler than the show itself, though they do require a well-stocked liquor cabinet.

Continue reading ‘Tipple Tuesday: Lost’

Comments

Tags:

Tipple Tuesday: Drunk on The Wire

the wire cast

I’m still reeling from the penultimate episode of The Wire and torn between excitement and dread for Sunday’s final installment. Excitement because, of course, it’s the final hour of one of the best goddamn TV shows ever, and dread for pretty much the same reason. The final hour. This is it. No more. It’s all over. Hold me?

Being the final episode ever is cause for sorrow, but it’s also cause to raise a glass and celebrate the five brilliant seasons we were given. While raising that glass, why not play along with the Pop Vultures final episode drinking game? It’s part of a new semi-regular Tuesday feature, inspired by a) my slight obsession with alliterative titles and b) my combined love of television and booze.

I’m starting slowly, though, with lots of sips. No one should be completely hammered while watching this sure-to-be brilliant hour. You ought to get drunk when it’s over.

Continue reading ‘Tipple Tuesday: Drunk on The Wire’

Comments

Tags:

Questioning Lost

lost

Right, people. Let’s talk Lost.

I must first confess that I am not one of the Lost faithful. I like it well enough, and some episodes have been incredible. On the whole however, I find the questions to answers ratio frustratingly high and wish, just once, they’d wrap up a storyline in a somewhat conclusive manner (and no, Nicky and Paolo don’t count). I’ve given up on the show more than once, but it somehow always lures me back in. Shirtless Sawyer may have something to do with that.

However, even more powerful than half-naked Sawyer was the producers’ promise to wrap up the entire story within 48 episodes. There was a plan! Some may claim there’s been a plan all along, but considering that Michael Emerson (Ben) was only supposed to be in a handful of episodes in the second season and is now a major player, I am dubious. Still, the show clearly had an endgame in place now, and while rambling, love-triangle obsessed Lost causes me to reach for the vodka bottle, focused, urgent Lost is plenty intoxicating on its own. In other words, I really like season 4.

Continue reading ‘Questioning Lost’

Comments

Tags: ,

Dem Bones, Dem Bones

There are rumors swirling that a tentative agreement has been reached and the strike is almost over, to which I say, “La la la I can’t hear you!” It’s not that I don’t want the strike to end, of course, but there have been so many rumors over the last few months that, until I hear official word from the WGA, I’m just going to pretend I’ve heard nothing. I’m not getting my hopes up for new episodes of Friday Night Lights and Gossip Girl until Nick Counter himself personally assures me that all has been forgiven and invites the picketing writers into a group hug.

I’ve been trying to use the strike time as productively as possible, though. This does not mean that I’ve been diligently working out or cleaning my house. Don’t be silly. It means, of course, that I have been catching up on missed shows on DVD.

After getting up to date with The Wire in time for season 5, I decided to branch out from my beloved serial dramas for a bit and try one of those shows that I never would have watched if not for its rather vocal fans: Bones.

Bones cast

Bones is, in fact, just the kind of show I tend to avoid. I’m not a big fan of the procedural, having seen, in my life, a combined three episodes of the Law & Order or CSI franchises. I don’t care whodunit or how or why. I have no interest whatsoever in the inner workings of a forensics lab and, having worked in law offices, even less interest in the details of legal briefs. I don’t care how you dress it up; ex parte documents will never be glamorous. Other than House, I have never watched a single procedural on a regular basis, and even that I watch purely for House himself. The patients could all die horribly each episode and I really wouldn’t care.

The procedural aspect wasn’t the only strike against Bones. It also stars David Boreanaz, and when the show premiered, I’d just come off eight years of watching him play a vampire with a soul. I liked him in Buffy and Angel, sure, but to tell you the truth, I was not convinced he could actually act. I blame the Oirish accent he used in the Angel flashbacks for that misconception.

If you do like procedurals and David Boreanaz, you’re probably already watching the show, but if not, here are a few more reasons to check it out. The characters are all three-dimensional, unique and believable, which is more than a lot of shows can claim (Torchwood, I’m looking at you). The female lead, played by Emily Deschanel, with her intimidating IQ, fierce independence and mad forensic skillz, is arguably the strongest female representation on television today. The interpersonal drama is certainly present, but the emphasis on the case-of-the-week A-plot allows those relationships to develop slowly and naturally, rather than being forced for the sake of a ratings stunt (ahem, Grey’s Anatomy). Most surprisingly, the scripts actually reflect that these characters are PhDs working in a top-level forensics lab. They speak and act like really smart people, and not just when discussing their work. It’s a show that respects its audience’s intelligence, a rare gift in the current glut of reality TV.

While the strike still sucks in at least ninety-eight different ways, I am glad it allowed me the time to find this program. It’s one I’ll keep watching, even after the writers return to work.

Any other Bones fans out there? And has the strike given you the chance to discover any new shows?

16 Comments

Tags: , ,

Thursday Night Fight: Lost and Supernatural

I would like to have a word with those who did the television scheduling this year. Despite the fact that the television studios are now completely dark and we are down to approximately 38 minutes of original programming to see us through the year, they have gone and scheduled two excellent shows on the same night, the bastards.

Of course, Lost is making its highly anticipated and much hyped return. Even I, who had many harsh things to say about the show during its second and third seasons, am excited about that. Dedicated fans have actually been spotted walking around town with a stopwatch in hand, counting down each second until the unluckiest castaways ever return to the screen. I don’t think I need to hype this one at all.

Sadly, it’s going head to head with a fresh episode of one of the most underrated shows on television, Supernatural. If ever there was a time for a show to find an audience, it would be during this creative wasteland of a television season, and the poor thing is going up against Lost. You know, that other little show with a young, media-savvy demographic. Does the CW have ABC employees on the payroll? It’s the only logical explanation for this slow sabotage of its original programming.

Supernatural isn’t particularly ground-breaking or innovative; it’s basically The Hardy Boys meets the X-Files. However, it’s got one thing going for it that’s in short supply these days: it’s a hell of a lot of fun. You have two hot brothers chasing demons across the US in a 1967 Chevy Impala, blaring AC/DC and bickering incessantly. What’s not to love?

The scripts borrow liberally — and respectfully — from every B-horror film you’ve ever loved. The dialog is surprisingly sharp and funny for a CW show, and the chemistry between the faux brothers is spot-on. And while neither of the lead actors are going to win Emmys for this show, they’re a lot more effective in the roles than critics give them credit for. Call it the CW Factor. The show has also expanded beyond the predictable monster-of-the-week plots to create a fairly detailed mythology and season-long dramatic arcs, allowing the show a depth your typical horror fare might lack. Sure, I started watching because Jensen Ackles’ face was sculpted by angels and he has a voice made of gold and honey, but I kept watching because it’s a genuinely good show.

So watch Lost on Thursday. I know you’re going to. But record Supernatural. After all, you’ve got plenty of time to watch it later.

Check out the clips below for two scenes from Thursday’s episode of Supernatural and a conversation with the two leads, courtesy of the good people at Warner Bros. (Click “Channel Guide” in the top left to bring up the clip menu.)

So tell me: what will you be watching this Thursday?

25 Comments

Tags: , , ,

SAG and The Sopranos, Sitting in a Tree

Sunday night marked the broadcast of the only WGA-approved awards ceremony, the Screen Actors Guild awards. Although I did a little better than in my dismal Golden Globes performance, I’m still left with one huge, unanswered question:

What, exactly, is the big deal about The Sopranos?

They won every television drama award it’s possible to win. Now, I watched the first season of the show, so I know it’s pretty damn good, but I didn’t enjoy spending an hour each week with remorseless killers and neurotic gangsters. Got issues, Tony? Here’s a tip: stop killing people. You might feel better.

I stopped watching, even though everyone kept trying to convince me that it was the greatest hour of television ever put to film. Eventually, in order to shut them up, I watched another episode sometime in the fourth season…and it was still an hour with a bunch of thuggish hit men who enjoyed ogling naked women in a strip club. Now, there’s a time and a place for that, I’m sure, but my television set was not one of those places.

This is an acting award, and so does not necessarily signify the best show, but even the ensemble award is suspect. Is this really the best cast on television? Maybe I’m taking this a bit too seriously. After all, The Wire was not even nominated but Boston Legal was, which could be taken as proof that there is no interventionist God. At the very least, it proves that some of the voters were high when casting their ballots.

I know the show is over now, but maybe someone can explain to me just what I missed. Is The Sopranos on your list of the greatest, most awards-deserving shows of all-time, and why? And what would you have picked in the following categories?

Keep reading for the winners.

Continue reading ‘SAG and The Sopranos, Sitting in a Tree’

Comments

Tags: ,

“Way Down in the Hole” With The Wire

The fifth season of The Wire has received a tremendous amount of press, most of it slavering over the pure genius of the show (I include myself in that). There has also been a fair amount of debate regarding the direction of this season. Is David Simon giving too much airtime to the newsroom at the expense of characters we’ve come to love? Has McNulty’s recent insanity strained the believability of his character? On a scale of 1 to 10, exactly how much do you want to see that punk-ass Marlo get what’s coming to him? (The only correct answer to that last one is 11.) However, there has been remarkably little discussion of this season’s version of the show’s theme song.

Tom Waits may have recorded “Way Down in the Hole” back in 1987, but twenty years later most people only know it as the theme to The Wire, if they know it at all. And that’s a damn shame, because this is one hell of an awesome song. Each season of the show features a new version of the tune, and they all interpret it differently. The Blind Boys of Alabama brought out its lowdown, bluesy notes, perfect for the first season’s focus on Baltimore’s inner-city drug trade. In season 2, Waits himself, the poet laureate of America’s working class, set the tone for the stories of the dock workers. Each season has used the theme to set the stage for its story arc, and I’m curious to see how Steve Earle’s version will match the show’s final season.

Have a listen to the clips below, then tell me: does this season’s rendition live up to those that have come before? And which is your favorite take on the song?

Continue reading ‘“Way Down in the Hole” With The Wire’

Comments

Tags: ,

Up on The Wire

the wire cast

I almost didn’t watch The Wire. I don’t mean this week’s episode; there was no way I’d miss that. Just in general. Five years ago, I sat through the first five minutes of the very first episode and decided it was a Homicide ripoff by someone who was really pleased with their ability to use the word “fuck” on TV. Then, I turned it off and forgot about it for another four years.

For the record, I’ve got to say it: damn, but I was wrong.

Now, of course, I know that The Wire is a Homicide ripoff in only the loosest sense, that being they’re both produced by David Simon. (Sadly, The Wire does not also contain Homicide star Andre Braugher, but I think that’s only because, if they added another insanely talented actor to the fold, they would exceed the Maximum Talent Level allotted to any one program. Viewers’ brains might explode from the utter perfection of the cast.) It’s not a ripoff, but rather an extension, one which explores stories the old NBC show never touched.

And extend it does. This isn’t just a police procedural; it’s the bastard lovechild of a cop show and a Russian novel. Stories and characters sprawl in every direction before circling back on each other, overlapping and blending and sometimes colliding. The show is meticulously crafted from start to finish. In four seasons, I can’t think of a single unnecessary scene.

It’s not a happy show, of course. Lots of good people suffer and lots of bad people get away with some really awful stuff. The relentless realism of the series ensures that there will be no happily ever after (though I’m rooting for one for Freamon, at the very least). No one is safe from sticky personal relationships and moral dilemmas that would make the devil himself nod approvingly. It’s a harsh land, this Baltimore. In fact, I’m sure the only people that could truly hate this show are on the Baltimore Tourist Board (new slogan: “Come to Baltimore! You probably won’t be murdered!”).

Season 5 is starting strong, though I’m sorry to see that the Major Crimes department has been disbanded yet again. Seriously, can we have one season where they make it through all thirteen episodes without becoming the victims of someone’s political maneuvering? Still, I’ll trust that Simon knows what he’s doing, because he hasn’t let me down yet, and the first episode’s references to season 2 suggest that he does, in fact, have a master plan. With only twelve episodes left, this season is bound to be a bittersweet one, each brilliant hour bringing this amazing series closer to its conclusion. When that day comes, this show will certainly take its permanent place on my list of the 10 Best Shows Ever. Still, that day can take its time getting here. Now that I’ve discovered The Wire, I’m in no hurry to let it go.

Comments

Tags: ,



Close
E-mail It